So, do I need to answer both questions in two separate paragraphs?
And can you please explain me the second question? I am quite confused about it.
“The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology outweigh the disadvantages.
Do you agree or disagree?”
The authors also suggest four techniques for overcoming these obstacles and generatingcreative options. First it is important to separate the invention process from theevaluation stage. The parties should come together in an informal atmosphere andbrainstorm for all possible solutions to the problem. Wild and creative proposals areencouraged. Brainstorming sessions can be made more creative and productive by encouragingthe parties to shift between four types of thinking: stating the problem, analyzing theproblem, considering general approaches, and considering specific actions. Parties maysuggest partial solutions to the problem. Only after a variety of proposals have been madeshould the group turn to evaluating the ideas. Evaluation should start with the mostpromising proposals. The parties may also refine and improve proposals at this point.
When the other party remains stuck in positional bargaining, the one-text approach maybe used. In this approach a third party is brought in. The third party should intervieweach side separately to determine what their underlying interests are. The third partythen assembles a list of their interests and asks each side for their comments andcriticisms of the list. She then takes those comments and draws up a proposal. Theproposal is given to the parties for comments, redrafted, and returned again for morecomments. This process continues until the third party feels that no further improvementscan be made. At that point, the parties must decide whether to accept the refined proposalor to abandon negotiations.
Fisher and Ury's first principle is to separate the people from the issues. People tendto become personally involved with the issues and with their side's positions. And so theywill tend to take responses to those issues and positions as personal attacks. Separatingthe people from the issues allows the parties to address the issues without damaging theirrelationship. It also helps them to get a clearer view of the substantive problem.
Not ready for essay prime time? Working on each piece of the puzzle separately can be the key to creating a killer essay. Start with the thesis statement and then build yourself some paragraphs, and you'll have a full essay in no time.
Fisher and Ury explain that a good agreement is one which is wise and efficient, andwhich improves the parties' relationship. Wise agreements satisfy the parties' interestsand are fair and lasting. The authors' goal is to develop a method for reaching goodagreements. Negotiations often take the form of positional bargaining. In positionalbargaining each part opens with their position on an issue. The parties then bargain fromtheir separate opening positions to agree on one position. Haggling over a price is atypical example of positional bargaining. Fisher and Ury argue that positional bargainingdoes not tend to produce good agreements. It is an inefficient means of reachingagreements, and the agreements tend to neglect the parties' interests. It encouragesstubbornness and so tends to harm the parties' relationship. Principled negotiationprovides a better way of reaching good agreements. Fisher and Ury develop four principlesof negotiation. Their process of principled negotiation can be used effectively on almostany type of dispute. Their four principles are 1) separate the people from the problem; 2)focus on interests rather than positions; 3) generate a variety of options before settlingon an agreement; and 4) insist that the agreement be based on objective criteria. [p. 11]
It is certainly fine to explain your answer to each question in separate body paragraphs. The second question means if you think it is realistic for people to expect job satisfaction when they have a job. Do you think it is likely they will get it or are they too hopeful.